|
WWOVF
Jul 16, 2004 21:30:35 GMT -5
Post by BOLO on Jul 16, 2004 21:30:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
WWOVF
Jul 17, 2004 1:30:26 GMT -5
Post by Peanut on Jul 17, 2004 1:30:26 GMT -5
BOLO, No you don't and no it doesn't. Funny thing here is, you really believe it does.
And this would be bad or insulting because?
I don't need a history lesson from you, this was all learn in grade 10. What I meant and what you know I meant, was that Canada, obviously has a stronger connection to Great Britain than France. Considering we are part of the Commonwealth and all.
What are you 4? That whole statement was irrelevant in proving to me you know more about Canada - it just shows me you can read a Canadian Newspaper.
NO, if they were in control, then they would have majority - this is not a hard concept to grasp. Simple numbers my friend, they have 134 seats, they need 155. Being in control, does not mean having to align yourself with other parties to have your bill passed. Done and DONE.
There is no way you were alive in 1966! You sound like a child, grow up. BTW, do not think you are egging me on or getting me irritated, you are simply responding like a child.
Am I president of the strongest nation in the world? NO, you cant compare me to Bush, it is not my responsibility to find OSAMA, it WAS Bush's. Are you so ignorant, that you are going to bicker with me over this? Or maybe so brainwashed you really believe your president had honorable intentions when going to war "for terrorism"?
Follow your own demands commrade and SHOW me this undying and loving for support from the families of the victimes of 9/11, for your liar of a president.
That's a really nice try at making me look like a bigot, but lets prove you wrong, shall we? First of all, i meant GAY, HOMOSEXUAL friends, talk to them about "freedom" THEN get back to me. NON-WHITE, meaning Blacks, Hispanics, Asian, both Eastern Asians and Southern Asians, and anyone else that doesnt fit the "idealistic" WASP. And you say I'm prejudicial; hey smartass, I'm gay!
And you are ignorant, love your 1984 complex you got going there.
Can you really be this dense? So by your twisted sense of logic, because ww1 and ww2 were fought most in Europe, we cant honor or feel for our dead in Canada or America? Are you just trying to say ANYTHING against me? How very immature of you.
- Then you are ONE family, not the majority. Stop speaking on others behalf, mein fuhrer.
And you are sad, sad little man.
|
|
|
WWOVF
Jul 17, 2004 1:32:55 GMT -5
Post by Peanut on Jul 17, 2004 1:32:55 GMT -5
Did that make you feel like a big man?? I'm happy for you.
And threat to ourself?? What are we going to destroy ourself with, let's see, our sense of multiculturalism, or maybe our "evil" ways of letting human beings express their love, and getting married? Or what about respecting the U.N. decisions? Yep, we are just a time bomb I tells ya.
|
|
|
WWOVF
Jul 17, 2004 9:04:47 GMT -5
Post by BOLO on Jul 17, 2004 9:04:47 GMT -5
Peanut. You are a loser and a lost cause. You don't even live in the real world. You deserve to be ignored. As to childish. You are, and have been, throught out all this. You are in denial, and can not get past your own failings. Alive in 1966? What do you mean by that? Ah never mind. You have no where to go, and nothing to do. btw. (Gay?) you sound morose to me. Vaya con Diablo
|
|
|
WWOVF
Jul 17, 2004 11:31:44 GMT -5
Post by TNRighty on Jul 17, 2004 11:31:44 GMT -5
Neither?
Too bad, that's not a choice. Peanut, your are grossly uneducated and ignorant. If you cannot see what is going on right now, you need to wake the hell up. bin Laden hates Canada, too. Anyone living in a free secular society is his enemy. That includes you. The reason he hasn't attacked Canada is because he doesn't have to. Ya'll are not going to stand up to him, and he knows it. This is World War III. Bush did not start it, but he's willing to fight it, thank goodness. What do you suggest would be a better course of action?
|
|
|
WWOVF
Jul 17, 2004 13:20:07 GMT -5
Post by BOLO on Jul 17, 2004 13:20:07 GMT -5
Apparently TN you can accept Peanuts air head responses. Mo power to you. I don't believe this individual even lives on the same planet. He is mighty full of hisself. It won't be interesting to see his response. It will contain no facts, or logic, just opinion, and suppposition, based on his "superior to thou" attitude. Ah well after you read it drop by the bar for a drink on me. ;D
|
|
|
WWOVF
Jul 17, 2004 14:10:44 GMT -5
Post by TNRighty on Jul 17, 2004 14:10:44 GMT -5
I'll meet you there.
|
|
|
WWOVF
Jul 18, 2004 20:54:19 GMT -5
Post by Peanut on Jul 18, 2004 20:54:19 GMT -5
Um, ok. You showed me. ;D
|
|
|
WWOVF
Jul 18, 2004 21:07:51 GMT -5
Post by Peanut on Jul 18, 2004 21:07:51 GMT -5
As are you. I've taken to one side of the argument you've taken to the other, who says what either of us has done, is wrong?
I really dont wanna quarrel with you, like I did the great and powerful wizard of Oz, errr, Bolo.
Did I ever state otherwise? He is a mad man, I have no sympathy for him, he must be found, put to justice and most importantly, him and his organization must be stopped - THAT is my point.
First of all, Canada never ducked out of this hunt for Osama. We have Peace Keepers in Afghanistan, remember 4 of our men were killed by one of your bombers (NOT trying to take a stab at you, just showing, we have our casualities as well, in Afghanistan). Secondly, I am in TOTAL agreement that OSAMA should be stopped, absolutely and completely. What Bush did and ordered to be done in Iraq SHOULD have been done in Afghanistan. Every thing should've been put into this hunt for him.
And what did your President and his Administration do? Fly 22 people with the last name of Bin Laden (cousins and relatives of Osama) out of the country on 9/13.
|
|
|
WWOVF
Jul 19, 2004 8:46:36 GMT -5
Post by scummybear on Jul 19, 2004 8:46:36 GMT -5
Oh come on now, who are you Peanut, Michael Moore? I know you're not that twisted. And I guess you believe Nixon killed Kennedy too? please!
|
|
|
WWOVF
Jul 19, 2004 11:39:08 GMT -5
Post by Peanut on Jul 19, 2004 11:39:08 GMT -5
But when you've seen the documentation, what else is there to think?
This has nothing to do with me being "Left-wing" or what have you, it just comes down to common sense. If someone hurt you, and you cannot find this person, who do you go to? The person's family, even if they can't or won't help, that's one of the most basic steps to be taken when trying to find the perpetrator (sp?).
|
|
|
WWOVF
Jul 19, 2004 12:59:32 GMT -5
Post by scummybear on Jul 19, 2004 12:59:32 GMT -5
(CNSNews.com) - One of the central charges made by left-wing filmmaker Michael Moore in his upcoming, Bush-bashing film is being undermined by another critic of the president -- former White House counter-terrorism czar Richard Clarke.
Moore's upcoming film, Fahrenheit 911, points to President Bush's rumored relationship with Saudi officials as the motivating factor in the president allegedly allowing relatives of terror mastermind Osama bin Laden to fly out of the country following the Sept.11, 2001 terror attacks.
But Clarke recently admitted that he alone approved the exit of the bin Laden kin -- damaging the key premise of Moore's film. . .
There's more, but I was unable to get the link, but you can find it at CNSnews.com., and just about anywhere ( but not left-wing kook publications and propagandist attack films)
|
|
|
WWOVF
Jul 19, 2004 16:15:53 GMT -5
Post by Peanut on Jul 19, 2004 16:15:53 GMT -5
Bush still could've stopped Clarke, no??
|
|
|
WWOVF
Jul 19, 2004 17:51:23 GMT -5
Post by scummybear on Jul 19, 2004 17:51:23 GMT -5
When Bush-Bashers Collide? Moore's Film at Odds with Clarke Remarks By Marc Morano CNSNews.com Senior Staff Writer June 01, 2004 (CNSNews.com) - One of the central charges made by left-wing filmmaker Michael Moore in his upcoming, Bush-bashing film is being undermined by another critic of the president -- former White House counter-terrorism czar Richard Clarke.
Moore's upcoming film, Fahrenheit 911, points to President Bush's rumored relationship with Saudi officials as the motivating factor in the president allegedly allowing relatives of terror mastermind Osama bin Laden to fly out of the country following the Sept.11, 2001 terror attacks.
But Clarke recently admitted that he alone approved the exit of the bin Laden kin -- damaging the key premise of Moore's film.
Chris Horner, a GOP strategist, finds irony in the fact that the credibility of Moore's film is being undermined by one of Bush's biggest critics even before the film is released in the United States.
"When self-promoting, Bush-hating conspiracy theorists collide," Horner said of Moore and Clarke.
"One self-promoting, Bush-hating conspiracy theorist (Clarke) proves the undoing of another Bush-hating conspiracy theorist (Moore)," Horner told CNSNews.com.
Moore has alleged in interviews promoting the film that Bush and his father, former president George H.W. Bush, had close ties to the Saudis, which led to the decision to help bin Laden's family leave the country following the terrorist attacks.
Clarke's sworn testimony before the 9/11 Commission in March, describing how the FBI approved the flights for the bin Ladens and other Saudis to leave the U.S., may have strengthened that premise. But Clarke's interview with The Hill newspaper, published on May 26, contradicted that previous testimony.
.The decision to approve the flights, Clarke admitted last week, had been his own. The request "didn't get any higher than me," he told The Hill
"On 9-11, 9-12 and 9-13, many things didn't get any higher than me. I decided it in consultation with the FBI," Clarke said of the plane flight carrying bin Laden's relatives.
"I take responsibility for it. I don't think it was a mistake, and I'd do it again," he added. The Saudis and bin Laden's relatives were flown from the U.S. out of fear for their safety following the terror attacks.
|
|
|
WWOVF
Jul 19, 2004 19:42:34 GMT -5
Post by BOLO on Jul 19, 2004 19:42:34 GMT -5
My. My. Your persecution complex fits like a glove, wear it well. Poor thang! If you read a newspaper, and it said President Bush was Satan incarnate, you would believe it. You do not have the mental capability to utilize reasoning. You stop at acceptance. You are right.
There just wasn't, and isn't, anything to work with. Deductive reasoning escapes you.
|
|