|
|
Post by Matter on Aug 18, 2004 2:57:37 GMT -5
Matter. You introduced a change of subject to purposefully distract from what I felt was the matter at hand in an attempt to force me to defend my views, values, and motivations instead of dealing with the issue. Wrong, again, quiz kid. Review the thread and tell me who introduced communism as a reference point for outrage? Hmmmmm? Here, I'll help you: You introduced the communism material into the debate, sir. Not me. Since you introduced it as a reference point for outrage, I pointed out your hypocrisy. That's all I've done. Huh? I'll ask several questions here: 1. Who introduced the communism into the thread? 2. Last time I checked, I can address any subject you introduce. Agree or disagree? Go ahead and answer this question. 3. Did you read my response above? If she is talking about terrorists, you damn straight I'm all for nominating them for a dirt nap. I clarified that above. I do believe it's you that may have a little 'purposeful misrepresentation' here.  I'm a little confused on this one. Who's being intellectually dishonest here? Really, now. I've posted my position precisely with plenty of clarification and commented on material you introduced. You have yet to clarify the contradiction of outrage and have accused me of introducing something you brought to debate table. Who's being dishonest here? Everybody can review the posts... it's all there. Whatever. We can see who came in here to debate. |
|
|
|
Post by scummybear on Aug 18, 2004 7:56:49 GMT -5
I have to say; this is the same person who feels that we have violated Saddam Hussein's rights by showing him on T.V.
He's also the same person who doesn't mind throwing the Nazi term around freely among anyone with whom he disagrees.
And now when someone clearly refers to terrorists in a post, he takes an opportunity cry foul once again, and pretends to champion someone elses' rights.
Over-analyzing someone's statements (especially when everyone else knows what they mean) is a symptom of
losing yet another argument, and playing more games with semantics.
I'm done with this individual.
|
|
|
|
Post by Peanut on Aug 18, 2004 9:57:48 GMT -5
Hey Crackhead, look at the clip you put up on August 18th 2004, at 1:24am. THAT'S A CHILD, idiot.
|
|
|
|
Post by MO on Aug 18, 2004 11:06:47 GMT -5
I still have no clue what you're talking about, Peanut, but I have explained the rules to you too many times to count. You really are a slow learner! Bye-bye!
Folks-
Take a look inside the minds of what leftist freaks consider tolerance. I really do consider abortion to be mass genocide. I am offended by the thought of gay marriage, but I'm willing to debate both these issues. I don't just stomp my feet and whine hurl personal insults and demand that they go away.
|
|
|
|
Post by MO on Aug 18, 2004 11:14:57 GMT -5
Oh, I get it! Peanut was offended by my emoticon of the temper tantrum. Enough so to cuss me out on open forum. ;D They really did confirm many of the stereotypes all in one thread. They really are lacking in humor.
|
|
|
|
Post by TNRighty on Aug 18, 2004 15:39:12 GMT -5
Show me where Joanie specifically said the the "Muslim Culture should be exterminated." Anyone with half a brain knows she was referring to terrorism, and I suspect our resident crybaby knew this also.
|
|
|
|
Post by scummybear on Aug 18, 2004 16:20:12 GMT -5
Of course he knew it.
But for obvious reasons, he has a propensity to attempt to distract from the issue by dissecting it into irrelevancies that he gives far more weight than they deserve.
|
|
|
|
Post by TNRighty on Aug 18, 2004 16:45:28 GMT -5
Right on,
Typical liberal. When you can't debate, just scream, "RACIST!"
|
|
|
|
Post by MO on Aug 18, 2004 17:02:03 GMT -5
True, and he put that word in bold under the terms of use. Funny thing is, no one mentioned any race. Islam is not a race and not even a religion in the context it was being discussed in. The liberals need to realize that as long as it exists as a form of government and social philosophy in some countries, it can't hide behind religion. It's no more "racist" or "anti-religion" than discussing the pros/cons of a monarchy, communism or democracy.
As far as "hate speech" goes, what conservative view point do liberals not consider to be that? It's just the way they scream about their commitment to "free speech" while trying to silence anyone who disagrees with them.
He wasn't on the right side with his position, couldn't defend his position, so he made a decision to try and silence us with threats.
Good riddance to bad rubbish!
|
|
|
|
Post by Matter on Aug 19, 2004 3:03:44 GMT -5
Right on, When you can't debate, just scream, "RACIST!" I posted a thread on another forum that detailed the number of Jewish Nobel Prize Winners vs. Muslim winners. Guess what I was called? Hell, the other poster had even ventured to ask what contributions the Jewish people had made. No kidding. I pull up one very poignant statistic to answer his {very ignorant} question and I'm a racist. It's a very telling pattern, methinks.  |
|
|
|
Post by Matter on Aug 19, 2004 3:06:59 GMT -5
Show me where Joanie specifically said the the "Muslim Culture should be exterminated." rush22 even conceded that he wasn't clear on this. Even if he's outraged by the quote referring to terrorists.... he ought to be prepared to defend his position. At any rate, not the first liberal type that I've seen pack up and leave. |
|
|
|
Post by MO on Aug 19, 2004 11:19:22 GMT -5
He didn't pack up and leave. He was banned. I will not have people threatening the forum because they are "offended."
|
|
|
|
Post by Matter on Aug 20, 2004 8:35:38 GMT -5
He didn't pack up and leave. He was banned. I will not have people threatening the forum because they are "offended." OK! I think he was growing tired of me, anyway. ;D |
|
