|
|
R.I.P
Jul 8, 2004 10:13:22 GMT -5
Post by pukaman on Jul 8, 2004 10:13:22 GMT -5
Come on you guys.....
How come your first tactic of debate is still the schoolyard technique of calling names. Can't you evolve a little more than that ?
from your replies, its obvious that you are so very proud of your inability to see beyond your self-imposed blinders.....
You guys are the perfect example of "deep rooted ideology"
Just say Poo Poo to anyone with a different idea, then continue shoveling in the crap you seem to swallow so willingly......
You really can't even imagine how you might be taken advantage of by your Masters in DC. Do you really believe that you are receiving a good deal on your political investment ?
The maturity level of your post speaks for itself.
Do you have a "Dictionary of Names to Call Liberals"?
you all seem to use the same "creative" phrases...
Such are the long term effects of having a Rush(ed) Limbaughtomy job....
|
|
|
|
R.I.P
Jul 8, 2004 11:00:45 GMT -5
Post by BOLO on Jul 8, 2004 11:00:45 GMT -5
Dear Scummybear. It is back.
More juvenile drivel.
As you may well note this tactic is of course assigned to us, not it. I note however it has removed it's posting,
(Edited is what it says) and I am sure you noted the following schoolyard technique of inferred name calling.
You may further not that it makes accusations with no supporting facts or basis, such as;
Seems rather school yardish, doesn't it?
You may also observe the Childish attempt to turn the words against your opponent by using the same words in a different context.
In this it misses the point. We do indeed have deep rooted Ideologies, it seems to think, and tries to imply, that this is some how wrong. I am sure you will agree it shows lack of intellect and a definite perception problem.
I noted with bemusement the following childish accusation,
POO POO???
Grown up isn't it?
Included in this drivel is the following, designed to inflame, insult, and accuse.
Masters in DC. It speaks in surreal terms, and Dogmatic idioms.
I know that I really believe, that we are receiving a good deal on our political investments? How bout you Scummybear?
It of course insinuates, poorly, that we are not. I should suspect that it believed I or you or someone on this Forum would instantly leap to the defense, and deny that we are receiving a good deal or that we have deep rooted ideologies. Poor debate skills are evident here.
It is especially evident in this bit of nonsense.
It is correct. The maturity level does speak for itself. It has made an obviously determined effort to denigrate that level by insinuation. It misses the point that on a scale of one to ten, ten being the highest, our maturity level is ten, and it's, is a minus one. It may explain why it can not compare.
I have a dictionary of course and there are many names it it.
Does it once again miss the point? Yes it does.
It seems to feel these are bad things which beggars the obvious. What ethical, and moral, compass does it use.
Answer. LIBERAL.
Ah, but that was obvious.
Well there is , obviously, not going to be any intelligent discussion here. I must go now, I have important things to do.
Barkeep, Barkeep, An Amber Bock please. ;D
Later.
BOLO
|
|
|
|
R.I.P
Jul 8, 2004 12:34:21 GMT -5
Post by pukaman on Jul 8, 2004 12:34:21 GMT -5
Yes...... A point of agreement: "Well there is , obviously, not going to be any intelligent discussion here." you got that right.  |
|
|
|
R.I.P
Jul 8, 2004 13:08:58 GMT -5
Post by BOLO on Jul 8, 2004 13:08:58 GMT -5
We already knew that.  |
|
|
|
R.I.P
Jul 8, 2004 20:47:43 GMT -5
Post by scummybear on Jul 8, 2004 20:47:43 GMT -5
Yes...... A point of agreement: "Well there is , obviously, not going to be any intelligent discussion here." you got that right. And the reason for that is you continue to post blabbering, unfounded, canned, idiotic statements without any elaboration or fact to support it. You haven't posted one; and I mean ONE, link or excerpt from a link to support anything that you've said. Therefore, as BOLO said, your comments sound childish and uninformed. You sound like a paranoid personality type when you talk about the government. Let me tell you that there are plenty of things about the government that require monitoring, but the Bush administration (if that's who you're refering to ) is not one of them. Idea? What are your ideas? I'd like to hear em! Start spitting em out! It's anybody's guess as to what you're talking about here. I'll bet (although you'd never admit it) that you have never listened to Rush Limbaugh for more than thirty seconds if at all, in your whole life. If you had, you might be a little more enlightened that you seem to be. Try listening, you might learn something. I won't be responding to your posts hereafter, unless you can at least try to bring something to the board to back up your b.s. Good luck in rehab! |
|
|
|
R.I.P
Jul 15, 2004 17:00:56 GMT -5
Post by rush22 on Jul 15, 2004 17:00:56 GMT -5
Hiya BOLO. No, that isn't me, and no I did not go away, much to your chagrin I'm sure. ;D
|
|
