|
|
Post by groucho on Nov 13, 2004 1:56:21 GMT -5
And it happened in CALIFORNIA, of all places!!!
Scott Peterson being found guilty of murdering his unborn son Connor has set the precedent, folks.
It wasn't the Supreme Court.
The Judge wasn't a Bush appointee.
The jury was as "off the street" as can be found in California.
All of a sudden, THE PEOPLE are speaking - not the media, pundits, or whoever - this country is beginning to EXERCISE again - and the liberals can't handle it. First Dubya's re-election, and now a PUBLIC denunciation of Roe - in the very CLEAVAGE of Liberalism - what more needs to be said??
MERRY CHRISTMAS, FELLOW PRO-LIFERS!!!! ;D ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by SatanIncarnate on Nov 13, 2004 5:42:12 GMT -5
And it happened in CALIFORNIA, of all places!!! Scott Peterson being found guilty of murdering his unborn son Connor has set the precedent, folks. It wasn't the Supreme Court. The Judge wasn't a Bush appointee. The jury was as "off the street" as can be found in California. All of a sudden, THE PEOPLE are speaking - not the media, pundits, or whoever - this country is beginning to EXERCISE again - and the liberals can't handle it. First Dubya's re-election, and now a PUBLIC denunciation of Roe - in the very CLEAVAGE of Liberalism - what more needs to be said?? MERRY CHRISTMAS, FELLOW PRO-LIFERS!!!! ;D ;D ;D ;D They have been doing that for years. THat was always an issue with pro-lifers. The fact that you can go to a clinic and get it done, but if somebody kills you on your way there they get charged with your murder and the babies. This ruling doesn't change the status quo in anyway. Plus, I believe Laci was in her third trimester. I believe third trimesters abortions are illegal nowadays anway. At least they are in my state. Sorry to rain on your parade. |
|
|
|
Post by lisa on Nov 13, 2004 22:48:28 GMT -5
The "late-term-abortion" is illegal only because Pro-Lifers pushed for it Satan. We will continue to push. As Groucho said, America is turning back to her Moral Values. That is as it should be. No longer will Christian Values, Moral Values be the door mat the left wipes their feet on. Life does mean something. Get used to it! That idea is here to stay!  |
|
|
|
Post by SatanIncarnate on Nov 14, 2004 8:02:05 GMT -5
The "late-term-abortion" is illegal only because Pro-Lifers pushed for it Satan. We will continue to push. As Groucho said, America is turning back to her Moral Values. That is as it should be. No longer will Christian Values, Moral Values be the door mat the left wipes their feet on. Life does mean something. Get used to it! That idea is here to stay! My point is that the Peterson verdict did not change anything, and it didn't. I guess if you want to think it did you can, but you are wrong. In fact, here is a website that explains my position on this: |
|
|
|
Post by Vagrant on Nov 14, 2004 10:01:19 GMT -5
No they're right Satan and its very scary. This ruling in effect gives legal precedence to put a ban on abortion.
|
|
|
|
Post by SatanIncarnate on Nov 14, 2004 10:38:34 GMT -5
No they're right Satan and its very scary. This ruling in effect gives legal precedence to put a ban on abortion. What part of this was already a law don't you get. It doesn't change any precedent because there have already been similar rulings. |
|
|
|
Post by Ian on Nov 16, 2004 21:24:24 GMT -5
Satan is correct. The double standered appointed by the looney left is staggering yet has been stagering for years. We should all just remember: You're not a God until you go through 4 years of med school. Come on people, its not that hard!  |
|
|
|
Post by groucho on Nov 19, 2004 1:54:04 GMT -5
What part of this was already a law don't you get. It doesn't change any precedent because there have already been similar rulings. At least you recognize it as a law, rather than an "ammendment to the Constitution," or a "woman's right." However, the very "legality" comes from a shamelessly sorry piece of judicial legislation; ie, Roe v Wade. The truth? R v W is simply a failure of the system of checks and balances; the Supreme Court crossed the line between branches of Government, when they handed down the original verdict - and Congress covered their a s s e s most effectively; the "verdict" became law. What's more, both the majority of the Supreme Court and the majority of Congress at the time were liberals - need I elaborate? The Peterson case does indeed establish a precedent, but that's ALL it does - the changes wrought from this remain to be seen; I wasn't clear on that point in my initial post. Sorry 'bout that, Chief!!  ;D |
|
|
|
Post by margaret10200 on Nov 9, 2011 2:26:57 GMT -5
Margaret is a filthy, diseased prostitute trying to get calls, but I removed the contact info.
|
|
.jpg)
;D