|
Post by Cheneysmyhero on Nov 10, 2004 19:35:14 GMT -5
I believe there are greater grounds to impeach Bush than there ever was to impeach Clinton.
1. He lied to Congress, don't kid yourself he lied, to get them to give him the power to launch a pre-emptive attack on Iraq. The reason so many Democrat congressman were siding with the President was that they believed his "intelligence" to be real. I think that if we dig a little harder we would find that GWB knew the intelligence he had was fraudelent and used it anyway. SImilar to what a CBS analyst did with false information he had about the president.
2. He had Osama Bin Laden trapped in Tora Bora, at least his "intelligence" thought he was trapped there. What does our great president do? Send in so many troops that there is no way out, right? WRONG! He outsources the job of our soldiers to some two-bit War-lords and American enemy #1 gets away. Those war-lords were probably being paid by Bin-laden in the first place. Because of Bush's poor decision, Bin-laden remains at large to plan and direct future terror attacks on America. I believe this would be considered "adhering to our enemies" and is therefore grounds for treason.
|
|
|
Post by Cheneysmyhero on Nov 11, 2004 22:33:49 GMT -5
I didn't even mention the coup de tat he lead in Venezuela. Certainly that is grounds for impeachment as well.
|
|
|
Post by ImNotBenny on Nov 11, 2004 22:37:33 GMT -5
coup-de-wha? ;D
|
|
|
Post by Cheneysmyhero on Nov 11, 2004 22:41:38 GMT -5
I meant the Tour de France
|
|
|
Post by ImNotBenny on Nov 12, 2004 1:43:14 GMT -5
I thought the homo w/ scrote cancer always won that...?
|
|
|
Post by Cheneysmyhero on Nov 12, 2004 16:30:12 GMT -5
I thought the homo w/ scrote cancer always won that...? Yes, GWB does always win.
|
|
|
Post by Malebolgia on Nov 12, 2004 17:25:18 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ProChildren on Nov 13, 2004 0:29:44 GMT -5
Word up...
|
|
|
Post by DamienNeal on Nov 19, 2004 14:04:48 GMT -5
i completely agree. the move to impeach Clinton was obviously a right-wing coup attemp. Lets see: one pres gets a blow job and lies about it, the other pres leads his nation into an illegal and hugely unpopular war. Why has there been no mention of impeaching bush? Must be the fault of the lefty media, right??
|
|
|
Post by Ian on Nov 19, 2004 14:54:31 GMT -5
And of course since Bush is the President, he automatically has this power to look into other countries and see exactly what they have. You're right, he did know that there weren't any WMDs, lying son of a b.....
Oh, so what you're actually calling for is an investigation, not an impeachment, at least not until you know all the facts. Let's not rush to judgement next time.
Before I address your rant on the current President, I'd like to remind you of a couple things:
In 1993, the first World Trade Center bombing killed six people.
In 1998, the bombing of two U.S. embassies in Africa killed 224.
Both were the work of al-Qaida and bin Laden, who in 1998 declared holy war on America. In the fall of 2000 Clinton did nothing when the now infamous spy plane captured footage of Al-Qaida traning camps and of Bin Laden himself. An attack on either of these targets might have thwarted the plans of 9/11.
Now, onto Bush. The reason we did not send US troops into the unknown caves of Tora Bora, do I even need to continue?, is because they were just that, unknown. If Bush had sent US troops into those caves, where they would have surely been slaughtered, you would be the first to come out crying that they had Warlords who knew the area well at our disposal. You can read about the strategy in War of Words by Tommy Franks, the Commander of the mission.
|
|
|
Post by BOLO on Nov 19, 2004 15:36:27 GMT -5
Cheneysmyhero ImNotBenny Malebolgia DamienNeal Should be lined up against the wall and shot. On the grounds they provide no use to the system or humanity. Ergo they would not be missed. As they are all liars and miscreants with no redeemng values what so ever their demise would be a positive thing. It would increase oxygen availablilty, stop common sense eroision, provide for the common defense of insensible BS that they offer. This should take place as soon as possible since they are indeed an offense to nature and nature may retaliate. It could be costly for the rest of us. Suicide would be a considered offer. Of course there is the problem to be factored in that all of them together could not figure out which end of the gun to load and whch end the bullet comes out of. Just line em up and shoot them. ;D
|
|
|
Post by Ian on Nov 19, 2004 19:40:21 GMT -5
LOL, as DamienNeil said "I completely agree". There's really nothing like a good old fashioned dose of Fascism to take care of a few problems every now and then. <-------Note the Quote
|
|