Liberals are funny.

[Barney]

Here I am. Just came back from visiting one of my favorite (love to rile up them libs) forums where the liberal disease is living strong. (joste.com/forum)

Here is the scenario: Someone usually makes a post degrading Bush. I, in return, say the poster is wrong and give several reasons why they are wrong. The poster and a gaggle of others reply with (hold on to your hats) PERSONAL ATTACKS. I know what you are thinking. There is no way a liberal would do such a thing. They are supposed to be the well read members of society. Those who are in the know. The intellectuals among us. But that is not so. I give what I believe to be proof to support my side of the position and they don't feel any need to do the same.

Liberals: Bush sucks
ME: Not really... the economy is going good... etc.
Liberals: "As pertains to everything else you say here, every word is Horse sh_t!
Steaming sheep crap!
Mink dung! squirrel poop! Pigeon Plops!
Skunk skank!
Mind slobber!"

The first two sentences are made up, but, yes, that is actually cut and pasted from the aforementioned website. Real mature, isn't it.

Liberals have a belief. Their belief is that anyone can think any way they wish. if a person believes that killing the unborn is okay. Then go ahead and do it and you had better not berate another for their beliefs. BUT, if your beliefs do not agree with the liberals beliefs then you have absolutely no rights what-so-ever to repeat those thoughts.

One person actually summed up his beliefs by telling me about a bumber sticker that he saw. The bumper sticker said "Buck Fush". He said it as if the existance of this bumper sticker was relevant.

[midcan5]

Hello Barney,

I gotta say it looks like this administration is unraveling. From the resignations, to the indictments, to the investigations, to the poor handling of most issues it looks like mediocrity has won the race.

www.commondreams.org/views05/0919-25.htm

"With governing, it's been almost criminally incompetent -- failing to act on clear predictions of a terrorist attack like 9/11 or a natural disaster like Katrina, botching intelligence over Saddam Hussein's supposed weapons of mass destruction, failing to secure order after invading Iraq, allowing prisoners of war to be tortured, losing complete control over the federal budget, creating a bizarre Medicare drug benefit from which the elderly are now fleeing, barely responding to the wave of corporate lootings and running the Federal Emergency Management Agency into the ground. Not since the hapless administration of Warren G. Harding has there been one as stunningly inept as this one."

"The easy answer to the paradox is that Bush cares about winning elections and putting his ideological stamp on the nation, but doesn't give a hoot about governing the place. But that's no explanation because the two are so obviously connected. An administration can't impose a lasting stamp without being managed well, and a president's party can't keep winning elections if the public thinks it's composed of bumbling idiots. "

[Barney]

midcan... You are like Alan Colmes to me. I think Alan Colmes is one of the few liberals that actually believe what he says. I have alot of respect for the man as well as you.

SO... Please don't take this wrong... The subject is Liberals and their inability to have a mature debate.

Name calling is not a form of debate.

[MO]

They don't debate. When they aren't name calling, they are saying things designed to shut you up, like using something form the liberal holy trinity- "racist, sexist, or homophobe."

They can't win on the issues, so they use hyperbole and tired rhetoric designed to only evoke emotion over reason.

[midcan5]

Funny, can I say I told you so. The post above was from 2005, the 2006 election proved it prophetic. Guess the liberals can win after all.