Post by human on Nov 6, 2004 8:15:03 GMT -5
Islam killed a human, the world said OK: Van Gogh
Belittling Van Gogh status as human is what the world of denial and idiocy did when it apologized for Islam and called Van Gogh crime as a bare crime of free speech instead of crime against humanity.
The UN and the EU of shame that barely and shyly can not define a crime against humanity even if there is genocide, is not only, not fit to defend a mass of innocent people being killed for the glorification of Islam in Sudan, but also it is not fit to define what human is, and that because humans are the least represented in that corrupt body of ignorance and shame.
Van Gogh the human that defended the sovereignty of a follow human that is being demonized, categorized, shunned, oppressed, and his soul as human being compressed on a daily basis by Islam is much larger than the entire UN and the EU’ naivety combined.
The world’s leaders who are ready to cut short their schedules to line up at the midget of the devil’s funeral should ask themselves, why we are standing here, and whom we represent by doing that?
Is Arafat a human and Van Gogh is not?
Why GWB blessed Arafat’s killing soul, and didn’t even mention Van Gogh?
Is this issue has to do with realism, as much as Van Gogh killing has to do with free speech?
I am I being unrealistic and crazy human because I see Van Gogh killing a major crime against humanity and Arafat’s death compensation to that same humanity?
Why is it that every single day, I ask my self these questions while my mind is trying to envision the person whom I can look up for, for an answer but I can’t find?
Is there any human left in the world that has the guts to say, Van Gogh killing is a crime against humanity?
What about you Goofy Annan, GWB, Chirac Lapin, and the rest of the human like herds?
jack the human
Belittling Van Gogh status as human is what the world of denial and idiocy did when it apologized for Islam and called Van Gogh crime as a bare crime of free speech instead of crime against humanity.
The UN and the EU of shame that barely and shyly can not define a crime against humanity even if there is genocide, is not only, not fit to defend a mass of innocent people being killed for the glorification of Islam in Sudan, but also it is not fit to define what human is, and that because humans are the least represented in that corrupt body of ignorance and shame.
Van Gogh the human that defended the sovereignty of a follow human that is being demonized, categorized, shunned, oppressed, and his soul as human being compressed on a daily basis by Islam is much larger than the entire UN and the EU’ naivety combined.
The world’s leaders who are ready to cut short their schedules to line up at the midget of the devil’s funeral should ask themselves, why we are standing here, and whom we represent by doing that?
Is Arafat a human and Van Gogh is not?
Why GWB blessed Arafat’s killing soul, and didn’t even mention Van Gogh?
Is this issue has to do with realism, as much as Van Gogh killing has to do with free speech?
I am I being unrealistic and crazy human because I see Van Gogh killing a major crime against humanity and Arafat’s death compensation to that same humanity?
Why is it that every single day, I ask my self these questions while my mind is trying to envision the person whom I can look up for, for an answer but I can’t find?
Is there any human left in the world that has the guts to say, Van Gogh killing is a crime against humanity?
What about you Goofy Annan, GWB, Chirac Lapin, and the rest of the human like herds?
jack the human