|
Post by Matter on Oct 19, 2004 17:01:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by UncleVinny on Oct 20, 2004 18:43:20 GMT -5
There's enough good and bad on both sides to go 'round.
You have rich people like Bill Gates - uses his billions to build a mult-million dollar house as a tribute to his ego on the shores of Washington state, while on the other hand, you get a movie star, like Tippi Hedrin (?) who uses a few million to change her Santa Barbara ranch into a haven for old, injured animals.
Then you have another ego trip in Donald Trump. Another humanitarian in Sergeant Shriver who started the Special Olympics. So wealth alone is not the problem. I'd guess it's how you earned it and how you use it.
Lesseee . . . the Bush family earned an estimated $1.4 BILLION from the Saudi royal family over the last decade. What have they done? Bought G Jr. a baseball team. Paid off Carl Rove. Cannot think of much else.
|
|
|
Post by MO on Oct 21, 2004 2:58:45 GMT -5
That sure was a good example of completely ignoring the question.
|
|
|
Post by Matter on Oct 21, 2004 8:37:56 GMT -5
That sure was a good example of completely ignoring the question. Bingo. Kerry is stating the rich should pay more in taxes ....and then avoids paying taxes himself with tax-free bonds. Why not find a taxable investment instrument and back his words with his deeds? Hypocrite. HUGE hypocrite Vin, stay on topic...OK?
|
|
julie
German Shepard
Posts: 14
|
Post by julie on Oct 24, 2004 9:24:02 GMT -5
Bingo. Kerry is stating the rich should pay more in taxes ....and then avoids paying taxes himself with tax-free bonds. Why not find a taxable investment instrument and back his words with his deeds? Hypocrite. HUGE hypocrite Vin, stay on topic...OK? What purpose do tax-free bonds serve within the greater financial picture? Would society benefit more had Heinz paid 20% in taxes as compared to making 2.5 million available in bond money? Or: Would you recommend, for example, that Heinz be held to a 35% rate and eliminate bond options? Suggesting the wealthy pay more in taxes does not automatically exclude other tax provisions designed to put dollars belonging to the wealthy into positive play in our economy. I think we need to look at the whole picture, not just part of it.
|
|
|
Post by Matter on Oct 24, 2004 12:16:08 GMT -5
What purpose do tax-free bonds serve within the greater financial picture? Would society benefit more had Heinz paid 20% in taxes as compared to making 2.5 million available in bond money? That's not the point. Kerry is campaigning for the rich to pay more in taxes! Kerry pays an average of 12% in taxes on his income while campaigning that the rich should pay more in taxesDo you see the disconnect? I do not disagree that bonds are valuable....that's not the point here. No, if Kerry really believes what is he campaigning on...just purchase regular taxable instruments like stocks. I wouldn't have any gripe then...and he wouldn't be a hypocrite. Let's review:Kerry says: The rich should pay more in taxesKerry's action: Purchase non-taxable security instruments to AVOID paying taxesSee my point? He could have just purchased regular stocks and fulfilled his own campaign platform. *Sigh* I understand that. You and I are not running for president and campaigning for the rich to pay more in taxes (which is ludicrous, to begin with) while doing the exact opposite. Kerry is the only rich guy I see campaigning to pay more in taxes. Actually he appears to be campaigning for other rich people to pay more taxes... not him. Don't tell me, email Mr. Kerry. He's the one who is not 'walking his talk'.
|
|
|
Post by Matter on Oct 26, 2004 16:21:44 GMT -5
...more information to consider: Some more interesting stuff about the Kerry-Heinz taxes... nypost.com/postopinion/editorial/32173.htmWhy didn't they release all of their tax records like the President?*sniff* I do believe the foul stench of hypocrisy is getting thicker in here.....
|
|
|
Post by Matter on Oct 27, 2004 18:07:09 GMT -5
*crickets chirping * ;D
|
|
|
Post by Matter on Oct 28, 2004 4:50:53 GMT -5
*hoarse crickets chirping* ;D
|
|
|
Post by Matter on Oct 31, 2004 4:17:50 GMT -5
*hypocrisy reminder*
|
|
|
Post by Matter on Nov 1, 2004 10:02:41 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Ian on Nov 1, 2004 11:52:42 GMT -5
*sleeping crickets*
Why couldn't UV and Julie understand what seemed to me to be a simple, straightforward, and excellent point? Are they dumb or just deliberately misleading? But of course if you own a baseball team that exempts Horseface from hypocrisy. Great logic Vinney!
|
|
|
Post by Matter on Nov 1, 2004 13:58:25 GMT -5
*sleeping crickets* Why couldn't UV and Julie understand what seemed to me to be a simple, straightforward, and excellent point? I dunno. I've posted this in another forum and got virtually the same response from a couple of liberals. They could really defend their positions either on this one. This is 100% unadulterated 'tax the rich' hypocrisy.
|
|
|
Post by TNRighty on Nov 1, 2004 17:19:45 GMT -5
UV,
Bill Gates invented a product that people like. Thus, people buy it. Thus Bill Gates has a pile of money Evel Kneivel couldn't jump over. Good for him. If you've ever used microsoft windows, shut up. If you think Bill Gates is so evil, go back to the DOS days and see how much you like that. Try writing FORTRAN programs instead of using windows-based software. A few days of that and you'll be thanking Bill Gates. If you think you can do better, go design the next great software package and make your own pile of cash. No one is stopping you. Otherwise, shut up.
By the way, John Kerry owns a handful of mansions. Do you hate him, too?
|
|