|
Post by Foamy Dog on Jan 23, 2002 23:58:09 GMT -5
Equal rights are fine and dandy. Equal is the key word here!
So called political correctness and special interests have pushed things to the point that things are not equal. When people are afraid to speak there minds for fear of being sued by a bunch of whining touch-me-nots it's time to wake up and realize that freedom is being clouded in the name of (false) equality.
Now, every little thing seems to turn into a special interest issue. If this keeps going, the entire country will become paralyzed for fear of doing or saying anything. <br> By the way, I'm short not vertically challenged damn it! [/color]
|
|
sonofliberty17@hotmail.com
Guest
|
Post by sonofliberty17@hotmail.com on Feb 27, 2002 14:23:44 GMT -5
You're right about our rights being taken away but you fail to give evidence and documentation or atleast cite sources. Hate laws (hate crime laws, example:KKK) for instance are taking away our freedom of speech laws or atleast restricting them. These hate laws have already been passed in canada, this means that canadians cannot say a word against a homosexual or a person of a different color for the result would lead to being charged of a crime. I don't however believe that you're right about the paralyzing of america. First your rights will be restricted and taken away if they (feds) want to. One of the most important of these rights is the right to keep and bear arms as stated in the constitution. And if you look at the history of gun laws you will find that you have to register them now, people under the age of 16 can't own a rifle, no one under 21 can own a pistol. Or how about how the gov't takes away your god given rights for the gov'ts priveleges that they can take away at their will. This is where becoming a sovereign citizen comes into play. By becoming a sovereign citizen, you will be free from taxes (the IRS was really designed as a welfare program), having to register your vehicle or get a license (because you have the right to free travel).
You see when you are born your parents sign a contract with the corporation UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (as seen on all federal documents because its a title or name) But sovereign citizens belong to The United States of America (a description basically saying the states are united under the REPUBLIC of America. The government has been deceiving everyone ever since they were born.
Write back if you want
sonofliberty17@hotmail.com
|
|
|
Post by ja19412@wcu.edu on Apr 4, 2002 15:22:53 GMT -5
You know I agree with you. Our rights are being taken away. But, you have to have sources. Otherwise you are speculating, and speculation comes from ignorance. I can't think of anything of the top of my head...but I will try to later. Jeff out.
|
|
|
Post by asd@wer.com on Apr 22, 2002 2:48:15 GMT -5
Just a test
|
|
jackbleem@yahoo.com
Guest
|
Post by jackbleem@yahoo.com on Jun 8, 2002 3:55:11 GMT -5
sonofliberty,
I have read about the things you brought up. I am by no means an expert on them though.
From best I gather declaring sovernty involves UCC code, the 7th admendment to the constitution, and the things that we sign. In a nut shell declaring ones soverngty involves renouncing the ficticious identity assigned to us by our own concent and "living in our own skin".
What concerns me is driving a car ........ being able to continue to do business without persicution ....... untold liability because no one will insure me ............ someone trying to screw me over and not being able to stop them ............. being an alein not a citizen and being without country.
I am curious to hear what you know about the ins and outs of the proccess. At the very least to understand the system that I am participating in.
jack
|
|
|
Post by SlaveWatcher on Jun 27, 2002 19:50:35 GMT -5
"You see when you are born your parents sign a contract with the corporation UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (as seen on all federal documents because its a title or name) But sovereign citizens belong to The United States of America (a description basically saying the states are united under the REPUBLIC of America. The government has been deceiving everyone ever since they were born."
An a wonderful Corporation it is, complete with many other fraudulent subsidiaries and all based on the biggest show of unadulterated greed the world has yet seen.
Sadly you are ripped off from the day you are born, this being supported under a banner of "patriotism". No other country in the Western world demands so much of their citizens. On the other hand, you have been "allowed" a much proclaimed "freedom" that is nothing more than "face", - the US has very little of the freedoms of the majority of the Western world.
That is sad...
|
|
FRED Accordingtofredcom
Guest
|
Post by FRED Accordingtofredcom on Aug 26, 2002 19:44:27 GMT -5
Only an American could make such a statement Freedom also means you are free to leave, but you won't because your prison is your own lack of self worth and fear of the unknown.
|
|
|
Post by barral69 on Sept 26, 2002 23:59:02 GMT -5
I don't want to leave MY country. I just want the goverment to give it back!
|
|
|
Post by nospace on Dec 17, 2002 15:21:59 GMT -5
Hmmmmmm!!
[/glow]
Sounds interesting to me! At least then people who DO NOT own real estate would NOT be allowed to vote!
It sure would help keep a bit more STUPIDITY out of making political decisions!
Do you even know that at one time in the history of America - ONLY land owners were allowed to vote? --- That was where a woman married to a man was not allowed to vote - because it was the man who worked the farm - so he bought the amount of land he was willing to work.
|
|
|
Post by nospace on Dec 17, 2002 16:12:39 GMT -5
Equal rights are gained by fighting for what you want! MOST Anglo-Americans are to passive to do that! Here are a few places where UN EQUAL RIGHTS survive:[glow=blue,1,900]Negro American Collge Fund | Why isn't it JUST an American or even a POOR AMERICAN college fund? "OR" ... even a white college fund (which would also require an Indain and Hispanic, and a muslim, and a Jewish college fund).[/glow] | [glow=red,1,900]The Black Businessmens Directory (last year) of Fayetteville, NC | How many law suits would have come from a WHITE BUSINESSMANS DIRECTORY?[/glow] | [glow=blue,1,900] The Black Maid Service (I think out of Durham, NC) | Is it possible that they hire whites?[/glow] | [glow=red,1,900]No Smoking in Public Buildings. | ... sure - NOW send the smoker outside in the rain and snow![/glow] |
... and there is more out there! A LOT More!
|
|
|
Post by dixiedoll on Mar 27, 2003 22:19:24 GMT -5
:'(I find it very interesting that in my beloved country---the U S of A---you can tell jokes about Italian's and Latino's and Poles, but everybody is off limits. If you DARE make a black joke you have committed a hate crime and now it's Muslums who are screaming. BUT I don't see loyalty to America coming from those groups. All I hear is whining about how unfair they are being treated. Give me a break. My people came here from central Europe carrying their belongings in bundles and in one generation they put kids in college and worked like dogs to make good for their families. No whining about how unfair things were because it was hell from where they lived before. So now what is going to happen to the dude who killed 2 American officers---because he was against the war? Nothing because he's black. DON'T ANYBODY DARE CALL ME ANTI -- ANYTHING. I'm an AMerican first last and forever--not a blank-American as some wish to be called.
|
|
|
Post by StillMe on Apr 21, 2003 14:08:22 GMT -5
These are all very good points. Why are some groups off limits? Forinstance, many US reporters have lost their jobs for speaking ill of Bush. US actors who have spoken out against Bush, have been persecuted by just about every organization there is. Bush himself has a family background of supporting US and German Nazism - this goes all the way up to George Bush Senior. If no one should be off limits, lets make no one off limits. Democracy and free speech are fading as some people have already argued. This is clear when the US barely blinks an eye at a president who was given power from a court that has more Republicans on it than democrats, despite the fact that the obvious solution to the Florida problem would be a re-election or giving the US leadership to the guy who actually got the most votes in the US. For more info on stuff like this, check out eventsquarterly.com/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.pl?board=a
|
|
|
Post by Joel on May 21, 2003 15:26:29 GMT -5
The first thing to remember is a government cannot grant your rights. It can only take them away. The rights documented in the US Consitution are described as incapable of being alienated. They are God-given to every human citizen.
It is one thing to be tolerant toward those who differ from the majority and another thing to approve of the differences. When most people talk of showing tolerance, they really mean giving approval. This is what has become "out of hand".
As a US Citizen, you have the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness - but never at the cost of someone else's inalienable rights. You have the right to pursue changing societal norms and there are successful examples of this. You do not have the right to societal approval.
Certain groups have pursued approval by creating an atmosphere, which violates the right of free speech.
Joel NoPunditIntended.com
|
|
|
Post by garrett7855 on Jun 6, 2003 22:11:25 GMT -5
Just a quick comment--I'm not so certain that united negro college fund is racist-i'm very definitely anglo, but waaaayyyy back, when i was getting out of high school and headed for college, the largest grant i got ($4,ooo), came from that supposedly racist organisation. i'm not saying the basic idea is wrong, but we shouldn't allow ourselves to make the same types of statements liberals make, without being certain of our source info.
as to the issue of "hate crimes", this particularly nasty piece of legislation would better be described as thought control--how can anyone presume to know what a person is thinking at the time a crime is committed?? i find the concept ludicrous and repellent--Orwell may have been right--only the dates have been changed to protect the ignorant.
|
|