|
Post by Ian on Dec 12, 2004 11:35:05 GMT -5
I was wondering Ian, just what part of a Liberal do you like to put in your mouth for that bad taste? Ask your wife.
|
|
|
Post by getoverit on Dec 13, 2004 14:42:10 GMT -5
I already know what she likes to put in her mouth. But that's heterosexual activity when a woman does it. Anyway, I guess you've answered my question.
|
|
|
Post by JacobBo79by on Dec 13, 2004 17:37:54 GMT -5
You make a good point and I have to say I agree but wouldn't you say that some conservatives are the same way? Anyone can be uneducated on the topics, conservative or liberal. Liberals may say you're stupid just a conservative may say to a liberal you're weak.
|
|
|
Post by Ian on Dec 13, 2004 19:54:28 GMT -5
I already know what she likes to put in her mouth. But that's heterosexual activity when a woman does it. Anyway, I guess you've answered my question. Good attempt, I'll give you an A for effort. I don't know, I think that surfing a political board and making asinine comments without adding anything to the conversation is rather "gay". I'll respond in more depth to your posts when they merit as much.
|
|
|
Post by getoverit on Dec 14, 2004 19:29:24 GMT -5
Asinine? That's kind of harsh. Juvenile, maybe.
But I get to keep the "A", right?
Okay, okay. I do have a serious question that I hope does merit a response from you or someone else here. Actually 2 questions.
I have belonged to or visited several political forums such as this. Some left and some right and one I couldn't tell either way and I see a lot of hostility associated with the word "liberal". I mean "I hope they die a horrible death" and "they are the scum of the Earth" type hostility. And usually it's in a conversation between a group of Conservatives, so it wasn't in any response to a Liberals post. #1 Why?
#2 Exactly what does "elite liberal" or "liberal elite" mean? I know the Websters definition of the two separate words, but when you put them together it seems to take on a whole new derogatory meaning.
Seriously. Any takers here? Anybody?
|
|
|
Post by Ian on Dec 15, 2004 10:55:22 GMT -5
Asinine? That's kind of harsh. Juvenile, maybe. Ummm...I've re-read your post several times to be sure I didn't miss anything and I think asinine (adj. complacently or inanely foolish) fits almost perfectly. ;D But I get to keep the "A", right? Only if I get to keep the asinine. I have belonged to or visited several political forums such as this. Some left and some right and one I couldn't tell either way and I see a lot of hostility associated with the word "liberal". I mean "I hope they die a horrible death" and "they are the scum of the Earth" type hostility. And usually it's in a conversation between a group of Conservatives, so it wasn't in any response to a Liberals post. #1 Why? #2 Exactly what does "elite liberal" or "liberal elite" mean? I know the Websters definition of the two separate words, but when you put them together it seems to take on a whole new derogatory meaning. Seriously. Any takers here? Anybody? Ummm..sure. #1 I'm not sure what goes on in the minds of zealots, you may want to ask Michael Moore or UncleVinny. I've been trying to find the answer to the very same question myself. #2 The liberal elite has been personified by the likes of Susan Sarandon and her child groom Tim Robbins, Alec Baldwin, Jane Fonda, Sean Penn, Whoopi Goldberg, Dustin Hoffman, Janeane Garofalo, and the up-and-coming Al Franken, just to name a few. If you would like to become part of the liberal elite you must meet the following conditions: 1) You SHANT make the majority of your money from a real job. 2) You MUST NOT be afraid to speak you mind and voice any idea, no matter how foolish and uninformed it may be. 3) We insist you contribute your money, but more importantly, others money to radical left-wing groups, i.e. the Democratic Justice Fund which seeks to ease restrictions on Muslim immigration from "terrorist" states, or Ramsey Clark's International Action Center which offered to defend Saddam Hussein, or even the National Lawyers Guild, organized as a communist front during the Cold War era. One of their attorneys, Lynne Stewart, has been arrested for helping a client, Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman, communicate with terror cells in Egypt. He is the convicted mastermind of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. Or perhaps social issues are your thing, well feel free to choose from the most violent of all homosexual action groups, ACT-UP, or perhaps you favor the "Barrio Warriors". Please give generously! ;D Such celebrity donors to these groups include Teresah Heinz Kerry! Its all the rage!!! Hope this post was enlightening getoverit, now perhaps we will be able to engage in thoughtful discussions rather than trade “juvenile” insults. I look forward to your coming posts.
|
|
|
Post by JacobBo79by on Dec 15, 2004 15:58:56 GMT -5
The liberal elite has been personified by the likes of Susan Sarandon and her child groom Tim Robbins, Alec Baldwin, Jane Fonda, Sean Penn, Whoopi Goldberg, Dustin Hoffman, Janeane Garofalo, and the up-and-coming Al Franken, just to name a few. If you would like to become part of the liberal elite you must meet the following conditions: 1) You SHANT make the majority of your money from a real job. Then by default, no celebrity has a real job. 3) We insist you contribute your money, but more importantly, others money to radical left-wing groups, i.e. the Democratic Justice Fund which seeks to ease restrictions on Muslim immigration from "terrorist" states, or Ramsey Clark's International Action Center which offered to defend Saddam Hussein, or even the National Lawyers Guild, organized as a communist front during the Cold War era. One of their attorneys, Lynne Stewart, has been arrested for helping a client, Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman, communicate with terror cells in Egypt. He is the convicted mastermind of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. Or perhaps social issues are your thing, well feel free to choose from the most violent of all homosexual action groups, ACT-UP, or perhaps you favor the "Barrio Warriors". Please give generously! ;D Such celebrity donors to these groups include Teresah Heinz Kerry! Its all the rage!!! ACT-UP is violent, please explain. What about the Westboro Baptist Church members notorious for protesting God Hates F*gs at funeral homes?
|
|
|
Post by Ian on Dec 15, 2004 16:23:55 GMT -5
You learn quick. I'm impressed, most liberals have a harder time grasping the logical concepts of modern conservatism. I don't believe that Ted Nugent has a real job either. This, however, is not the defining characteristic of the liberal elite. Ever heard of ACTUP San Fransisco? See: www.marijuana.org/SFChron9-21-2000.htm for an article from a pro-gay take on ACTUP and also www.aegis.com/news/bar/2000/BR000407.htmlAnd which right-wing celebrities have endorsed and given money to this group? Your analogy doesn't hold water, you're grabbing at straws. Its all right, several desperate liberals have demonstrated the same deceptive tactics in earlier posts, I'm just disappointed that you have fallen to the leftist norm.
|
|
|
Post by Patriot on Dec 15, 2004 16:38:30 GMT -5
Pardon the intrusion, but might I ask just what "Getoverit" would have us get over?
|
|
|
Post by Ian on Dec 15, 2004 16:45:01 GMT -5
I would assume it has something to do with the Clinton reign. Could he possibly be talking about the 2000 or 2004 election?? I think not.
|
|
|
Post by JacobBo79by on Dec 15, 2004 21:57:03 GMT -5
You learn quick. I'm impressed, most liberals have a harder time grasping the logical concepts of modern conservatism. I don't believe that Ted Nugent has a real job either. This, however, is not the defining characteristic of the liberal elite. Do you see the hypocrisy? Wasn't that #1 on the list. In your original post it wasn't ACTUP San Fransisco it was just the ACT-UP, the major diference is explained in your url... deceptive tactics
|
|
|
Post by Ian on Dec 16, 2004 11:34:04 GMT -5
It was a list of characteristics listed in no particular order. Read the other requirements, the liberal elite must meet all, or are you saying that Ted Nugent IS part of the liberal elite? No hypocrisy here, just a rather amusing misunderstanding on your part.
I said ACT-UP. Run a google search on ACT-UP violence and you will find my sources.
|
|
|
Post by getoverit on Dec 16, 2004 18:41:34 GMT -5
Sorry people, "getoverit" doesn't mean anything in particular. It wasn't my first choice, which was already being used.
Ian, thanks for the reply.
|
|
|
Post by Patriot on Dec 16, 2004 19:10:04 GMT -5
Sorry people, "getoverit" doesn't mean anything in particular. Ah yes, no surprise, as it is in character with the liberal mentality to harp on things which don't mean anything in particular. Incidentally: here's an interesting fact. Landslides cause 1.5 billion worth of property damage in the US every year, independent of human activity, and cause between 25-50 deaths anually. Why doesn't the liberal media cover those deaths? Why do we hear nothing of the funding needed for that?You see, there's a lot right here that's simply ignored. If you look at the war in Iraq, it's really nothing more than a couple landslides here at home. That might sound crass, but it's true.
|
|
|
Post by getoverit on Dec 17, 2004 13:39:54 GMT -5
"Ah yes, no surprise, as it is in character with the liberal mentality to harp on things which don't mean anything in particular."
Patriot, you are the only one who is harping here. It's just a name. Get over it.
And for your information, I voted Republican in November.
|
|