|
Post by midcan5 on May 20, 2008 11:37:09 GMT -5
Negotiating Isn't Appeasement by J. Peter Scoblic Bush, McCain and other conservatives are on the wrong side of history when they dismiss Obama's foreign policy. "In a speech to the Israeli parliament Thursday, President Bush took a swipe at Barack Obama for his willingness to negotiate with evil regimes. "Some seem to believe that we should negotiate with the terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along," Bush said. "We have heard this foolish delusion before. As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared: 'Lord, if I could only have talked to Hitler, all this might have been avoided.' We have an obligation to call this what it is--the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history." But if there is anything that has been discredited by history, it is the argument that every enemy is Hitler, that negotiations constitute appeasement, and that talking will automatically lead to a slaughter of Holocaust-like proportions. It is an argument that conservatives made throughout the Cold War, and, if the charge seemed overblown at the time, it seems positively ludicrous with the clarity of hindsight.The modern conservative movement was founded in no small part on the idea that presidents Truman and Eisenhower were "appeasing" the Soviets..." www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=ad9a12bd-5779-45c9-8976-de11bfe22440
|
|
|
Post by rideout on May 25, 2008 23:03:30 GMT -5
that's right, negotating with them isn't appeasement, it's a step toward appeasement.
|
|
|
Post by midcan5 on Jun 4, 2008 7:32:09 GMT -5
A slippery slope argument is not a good prognosticator.
|
|